A Letter to the Tejano Music Industry
- Forward


JANUARY 29, 2008

HOWDY!
DEAR FRIENDS, MEMBERS OF THE TEJANO ACADEMY:

WISHING YOU A BELATED HAPPY NEW YEAR!   MAY 2008 BE THE BEST YEAR FOR YOU YET, WITH BETTER ONES TO COME.   MAY ALL OF YOUR
ASPIRATIONS AND RESOLUTIONS BE FULLFILLED.

AMIGOS, LET ME GET TO THE MATTER OF THIS CORRESPONDENCE.   WE ALL KNOW HOW THE MUSIC INDUSTRY IS AILING AND HOW THAT AFFECTS US
ALL.  THERE ARE MANY FACTORS THAT ARE COMPONENTS OF THE PROBLEMS WE FACE WITH THE BUSINESS OF MUSIC AND SPECIFICALLY WITH
TEJANO MUSIC.   SOME OF THESE PROBLEMS WE CAN ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING ABOUT, OTHERS ARE OUT OF OUR HANDS, LIKE THE STATE OF THE
ECONOMY.   HOWEVER, AIRPLAY ON RADIO STATIONS THAT REFUSE TO PLAY OUR MUSIC IS ONE PROBLEM I SINCERELY BELIEVE WE CAN RESOLVE.   
WE KNOW THE IMPORTANCE OF AIRPLAY FOR THE SURVIVAL OF THE GENRE OF OUR MUSIC.   

THIS BRINGS ME TO THE POINT OF THIS LETTER.   A MEETING WAS HELD IN HOUSTON ON MONDAY, JANUARY 28TH TO DISCUSS OUR SITUATION AND
TRY TO FIND SOLUTIONS TO OUR WOES.   IT WAS A GREAT MEETING!!!   IN ATTENDENCE WERE SOME VERY IMPORTANT KEY FIGURES WHO ARE VERY
SENSITIVE TO OUR NEEDS,   CITY AND STATE OFFICIALS, MEDIA PERSONNEL, RADIO CELEBRATIES, RECORD DISTRIBUTORS AND TEJANO MUSICIANS
AND CELEBRATIES.



NAMES OF   ATTENDANCE:
Ret. Senator Gonzalo Barriento – Tejano Democrats, Senator Mario Gallegos - Texas Senate Dist. 6, Senator Eddie Lucio, Jr. II - Texas Senate Dist. 27, State
Rep. Dist. 143 Anna Hernandez, State Rep. Dist. 148 Jessica Farrar, Harris County Commissioner Sylvia Garcia, Little Joe Hernandez – La Familia, Ruben Ramos
– Mexican Revolution, Roberto Pulido – Los Clasicos, Roel Pulido – Los Clasicos, David Lee Garza – Los Musicales, Leonard Davila - Austin Tejano Music
Coalition, Lorenzo Cano – CMAS University of Houston, Jesse Rodriguez - Amigos Radio, Sammy Hernandez – Festival Chicano, Alfred Rodriguez - Amigos Radio,
Frank Flores – Go Tejano Committee, Diana Falcon, Falcon Productions, Ruben Cubillos – VIVE Tejano, Inc.



TOPICS DISCUSSED:
How Tejano Delegation was called to order to address Houston Rodeo controversy

Why is Tejano music not part of the 2008 Go Tejano Day at Houston Rodeo?

Analysis on how current conditions developed from record-breaking Tejano partnership

Discussion on understanding Houston Rodeo’s process used in determining entertainment

Discussion of power shift in Go Tejano Committee and Houston Rodeo officials

Discussion where Mexican Regional acts overshadowed long Tejano music partnership

Discussion of short term resolutions and long term goals to reconnect partnership

Redefine process in determining Tejano music entertainment

Form sub committee to explore Houston Rodeo’s official position, beliefs and consequences

Seek diplomatic solution to define the value of the Tejano music relationship

State of Tejano music – issues effecting the genre: limited radio outlets, limited support for new Tejano acts to find air-play on current stations, down sizing of
venues or their demise,  discrimination of aging audience base and the erosion of large events yearly




QUITE A LIST, DON’T YOU AGREE?

NOW THEN, THE MOST IMPORTANT AND PRESENT MATTER IS THE HOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO.   AS YOU WELL KNOW, TEJANO DAY AT
THE RODEO IS ONE OF THE HIGHEST MONEY GROSSING DAYS OF THE RODEO.   THANKS TO NUESTRA RAZA, LOS TEJANOS.

BUT CHECK THIS OUT, TEJANO DAY WILL NOW BE TEJANO DAY WITHOUT TEJANO ARTISTS OR TEJANO MUSIC!   SAY WHAT?

I DON’T KNOW ABOUT YOU, BUT I PERSONALLY FEEL ON BEHALF OF ALL TEJANO MUSICIANS, BANDS, ARTISTS, AND FANS, ABUSED, MISUSED AND
DISCARDED!!!   ¿QUE CHINGAS ES ESTO?   CARNAL AND CARNALAS!

FURTHERMORE AND ON TOP OF THAT, AS BOBBY BUTLER “EL CHARRO NEGRO” WOULD SAY, “THERE IS A PROBABILITY THAT THE POWERS THAT BE
MAY DO AWAY WITH TEJANO DAY ALTOGETHER.”   

YOU WILL BE INFORMED OF WHAT HAPPENS NEXT, BUT IF EVER THERE WAS A TIME OF NEED TO COOPERATE AND LEAN YOUR SUPPORT IN ANY WAY,
SHAPE OR FORM THAT CAN HELP US IN OUR ENDEAVOR TO MAKE THINGS BETTER FOR US ALL, NOW IS THAT TIME!!!

YOUR INVOLVEMENT, OPINION AND SUPPORT IS TOTALLY VITAL AND CENTRAL TO THIS CAUSE.   STAY POSITIVE, HEALTHY AND AWARE.   CONTINUE
SUCCESS AND RECEIVE THE ALMIGHTY’S BLESSINGS.   

REMEMBER ALWAYS, SI SE PUEDE!!!
TU AMIGO


LITTLE JOE

                                     The below email was sent by Mr. Saul Barbosa, with Stars Above Texas Music.  ..... WOW



hola friends & fans de la onda tejano,

although there are a lot of optimistic fans, artists, and the sort.
reality has once again set in on the state of tejano music in the new year.

many of you have predicted great changes, and progress for the largest growing segment of artists: namely female soloists. and many have been enthusiastic that
the ladies could help restore tejano to a wider audience.

but now lets examine reality, make that hard cold reality.
as you know by now the pre-nomination ballots have been released for public voting by the tejano music awards (ttma), and if one is to closely examine the stats,
they are quite bleak for the ladies once again. by pre-nominee, i refer to the process that only the final 5 can correctly call themselves "nominees".

1) there are 10 categories to vote on. for statistical reasons, let us remove male vocalists, female vocalists, and duets (usually male and female combo) from the
question on hand because they are, by design, exclusive by gender.

2) that leaves 7 categories with 12 pre-nominees each which equals a total of 84 candidates to vote on. of those 84 candidates only 14 are female, which is a
measly 16.5%. (83.5% male!!!)

3) the situation gets even worse when we examine the top 3 premium awards: "song of the year", "album of the year", and "entertainer of the year". of these 36
pre-nomination slots a thoroughly embarrassing 3 are for females. that amounts to just 8% of eligible candidates.(92%male!!!) (once again i have left off the other
2 premium awards : male/female vocalists for reasons already explained).

sorry folks!!! there just is no way to put a positive spin on this one. i already know those of you by name that try to find the silver lining where there is none.

of those 3 candidates , in item 3 above, two of the ladies are relatively "invisible" within the industry. so their chances of winning or even making the final 5, are
astronomically small. that leaves only one lady, elida reyna, among the top 36 pre-nominees, who has a realistic chance of taking home a major award!!! some
think this is progress within the tejano industry?

this flies in the face of what is happening around us, with greater visibility on the internet blogs & websites, radio airplay, and cd sales during this eligibility period,
which is for the later part of '07, rebecca valadez, leslie lugo, megan leyva, monica castro, veronica (of avance), among others have made major musical impacts
during this time.

the most blatant insult to the girls was the "album of the year" category. you have to go back to the selena era, 12 years ago, to find such a great crop of
successful albums put out by women in a single year. the lack of respect here is incredible as the list below should illustrate.

where is elida reyna. many consider this to possibly be her best album ever.
rebecca valadez, much better than her grammy nominated first effort, with a ton of hits.
leslie lugo's breakthrough with lots of airplay and sales.
megan leyva's 5th cd to date, and possibly most commercially successful.
monica castro, who achieved # 1's in mexico, tucson, and most importantly kxtn.
liza ybarra's critically acclaimed, that many have said is the best in 12 years, and quite possibly the best songwriter of the last 20 years.
veronica (of avance) a fan favorite, making huge waves everywhere she plays.
comeback efforts of delia gonzalez (of culturas) and agnes torres (of new variety)
footnote: the one girl who did make the top 12 albums is a relative unknown: ernestine romero and is highly questionable to put up against the likes of ruben
ramos, joe posada, ram herrera, etc.

this list is not all-inclusive, just the most visible of female artists that were blatantly left off the all male's club for "album of the year" by the "tejano industry".

the one category that the ladies made heavy gains in is the "most promising band" in which they received exactly half (6) of the pre-nominees. of course this is
important, but can one of them actually win?? once again it sends a message from the industry, that one day these ladies may be great, but not in 2007, maybe
not next year either, maybe not in 10 years. that is the problem with this category. why not award these girls right here, right now for their terrific music, songwriting,
and performing this year when they are making history.

for those of you who have never tried it, producing a cd, promoting it, and trying to tour with a band for a new-comer can be a mighty expensive process. why is the
industry teasing "most promising" instead of awarding what they are currently achieving.  just maybe you will give them that much needed push to keep producing
great music and performances.

as i alluded to above, production of a first class album can lead to the edge of bankruptcy, and maybe that is the motive of some within the industry for
up-and-coming females.....
as one die-hard tejano fan, t-man, stated recently that he has seen some 1000 up-and-coming female tejanas disappear without a trace. sometimes with a hit or
two, sometimes before they ever record. many of them super-talented. can you think of some of them???

of course these 12 pre-nominees are generated by, then voted on by the "industry" and not the fans. so who is the "industry" exactly and are they completely
oblivious to the trends in front of them?? i give the ttma a lot of credit for trying to create a fair system in which to determine worthy candidates (compared to some
other organizations out there). ttma has one of the best qualifying systems. all awards show have flaws, none are perfect and that includes the grammys
themselves. but the system is apparently broken and the ttma should seriously consider a revamping of entire process.

some have argued, what difference does it really make, it is only a awards show?? but who wants to host,  work hard to qualify for, participate in, and finally receive
an award from a "questionable ceremonies show? what incentive do these girls have to put out quality and creative product when they will never be recognized for
it. gaining radio airplay, live gigs, and cd sales is hard enough in addition to not having their hard work recognized in anyway what-so-ever.

of course the radio airplay/cd sales/giging all go hand and hand and are separate from receiving an award. but once again the industry, specifically the program
directors, are the ones blocking the women in that arena, and therefore is a totally different essay.

are there any possible solutions to this broken process??

just what if.....there was a "listening committee" that actually listened to each of the albums submitted. albeit a more cumbersome process, but not logistically
impossible, and we might just award those who are actually deserving. there might be a fighting chance for many of these girls rather than a system that, by its
very nature, is voted on by name recognition and a cultural based machismo.

certain categories would continue to have to be voted on by the "industry" such as "most promising", "entertainer" , and "showband", but the rest of the categories
could be determined solely by listeners who have no built in bias or favorites.

another quick and easy fix is to restore male and female entertainers as separate categories, knowing that the industry and fan base intrinsically favor men each
and every time.

footnote: the grammy (general grammy awards) process for voting on the tejano genre is somewhat different but similar in it's biases. first of all there is only one
award granted: "album of the year". that makes it winner take all. this means there is even less a chance of winning. one category/one trophy. another hardship is
that the "industry"  both generates and votes on the submitted albums. the public has no input what-so-ever.  the winner is determined by a behind-the-scenes
process of "who knows who". for this years awards approximately 10 of the 51 submitals featured female lead singers. a 1 in 5 chance?? or fat chance??...
predictably none of the five finalists were female.

to their credit, the industry did nominate one lady, rebecca valadez, in '07. apparently her work outside of the tejano industry gave her an unexpected edge.

this year's five tejano finalist featured 3 men around the 60 year age bracket, plus one man in his late forties. overall this is an abbe ration within the grammy
process where youthful  & female winners are abundant in most of the other genres. case in point: the big winner this year was the debut of amy winehouse,
a young female, new to the music scene who took home the most grammys with 5 total. can tejano ever award 5 trophies to the debut of a young female???? after
all neither the tejano awards or grammys are not handing out "lifetime achievement" awards. there is actually a special trophy for that and a separate "hall of fame"
organization.

once again i suggest a solution for the grammys of a "listening committee" that actually takes time to hear  all the submitted albums. i can almost put money down
that the five finalist would not include 3 male senior citizens!

seriously disappointed,
saul barbosa
stars above texas music
sacollectiblesii@ yahoo.com
 
NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURES OF THE SOUTH TEXAS SEGMENT OF THE CAMINO REAL DE LOS TEJAS

                                                                                                                            By
                                                                                                               Richard G. Santos


Last Thursday I had the pleasure and honor of having a lengthily meeting with Mr. Otis Halfmoon the tribal liaison for the Camino Real de los Tejas National Historic
Trail. The Santa Fe based gentleman is a member of the Nez Pres Nation. He came to meet with the Kickapoo’s at Eagle Pass and with me to learn about the Native
American cultures of South Texas. I took the opportunity to hand deliver this week’s column to emphasize that the history of the Coahuiltecan Indians of this area
who were completely assimilated into the Tejano population.

The dominant Native American Cultures existing in Texas between the Colorado and Rio Grande rivers since pre-historic times through the Spanish Colonial Period
(1518-1821) were the Gulf Coast Karankawa, south central Tonkowa, Tamaulipecos south of Laredo straddling the lower Rio Grande and Coahuiltecan straddling
the Rio Grande from north of Laredo to Del Rio area and central Texas area to the San Antonio-Goliad-Cotulla-Rio Grande. The Lipan Apache (and briefly, the
Mescalero) as well as Yamparica and Quahadi Comanche clans and tribes entered the area after 1700. It should be noted that by all cultural, linguistic and
geographic considerations, the Coahuiltecan culture should be divided into Coahuilan Coahuiltecan (from Monclova, Coahuila to Nueces River) and Texas
Coahuiltecan (from Nueces River north, east and southeast bordering the Karankawa and Tamaulipeco cultures).  The same could probably be said of the Lower
Rio Grande Tamaulipecos but the linguistic, anthropological and historical studies have never been conducted. However, as late as the 1880’s, a German linguist
reported 12 Karankawa speaking families residing at Rio Grande City, Texas. Texas Coahuiltecans meanwhile seemed to share their geographic area with Tonkowa
and Tonkoway (which could be one and the same).

By all accounts, the Native American cultures between the Colorado and Rio Grande rivers were nomadic, hunters-gatherers and most allied themselves with the
Spanish Colonial Culture for protection against the invading Apache and Comanche cultures. Consequently the Spanish government-church evangelization-
assimilation program succeeded beyond expectation. Other factors, including the British and U.S. Black Legend voiced by early U. S. born travelers and settlers of
the area, further served to eradicate the identity of the area’s Native American cultures as they were lumped into the Spanish speaking mestizo-castizo-lobo-coyote
populations of Texas and northeast Mexico.

         The British and U. S. governments east of the Mississippi River considered the Native American cultures as non-citizens to be dealt through warfare, territorial
displacement-relocation and/or commercial treaties. In the words of U. S. General Sheridan, “the only good Indian is a dead Indian”. In contrast, to the Spanish
Colonial Government, “the only good Indian was a tax paying, Roman Catholic, labor class citizen.”

         Beginning in 1541 with Las Nuevas Leyes de Indias, enslavement of non-hostile Native Americans was prohibited and the encomienda land-owning system
was established through which European landlords were charged with the conversion, protection and maintenance of any and all Native Americans residing on their
property. It is not surprising to discover in Spanish colonial documents of northeast Mexico many of the encomienda- residing Native Americans being identified by
the landowners’ last name. Hence by early 1700’s we read about the Ayala, Treviño, de la Garza, Chapa, et. al. Indians. Some were given their god-fathers’ last
name at baptism. Others were given the last name of the encomendero. Their indigenous identity began to blur.

The establishment in New Spain of the Colleges of the Propagation of the Faith in the 1660’s was designed for missionary orders to launch conversion-assimilations
programs. Consequently, the Spanish North American Frontier, and particularly northern Mexico, Texas and the Southwest, became the territorial domain of the
Franciscan and Jesuit missionaries. After the Jesuit expulsion from New Spain, the Franciscan Colleges of the Propagation of the Faith based in Mexico City,
Queretaro and Zacatecas reigned over the Spanish North American Frontier from northern Mexico and Texas to California. The Apostolic (non-missionary) Church
meanwhile, tended to the spiritual needs of the civilian and military population composed of 28 ethnic, genealogical castas as recognized by the Spanish
Government and Church of New Spain.

         Because the Native American Cultures along the South Texas segment of the Camino Real de los Tejas were nomadic, the Franciscan order of Missionaries
established missions at key geographic sites. Through a bilingual, bicultural education-evangelization program, the Franciscans successfully converted the Native
Americans to Catholicism and they assumed a Spanish citizen identity at baptism. Incidentally, the Spaniards referred to the missions as “reducciones” as the Native
Americans were “reduced” from a nomadic to sedentary lifestyle. The mission Indians thus became the working labor class serving both the missionaries and civilian
population. They were the farmers, ranch-hands, sheep herders, mason, construction workers, artists and eventual members of the local militia. Beginning in 1793
through 1824, the secularization of the Franciscan missions in Texas document the final assimilation step as the mission land was distributed to the mission Indians.
Furthermore, on October 12, 1837, the Bureau of Indian Affairs of the Republic of Texas presented a Resolution which cemented the assimilation of the Native
American cultures of the South Texas Camino Real de los Tejas. It reads “The people called Lipan (i.e. Apache), Karankara and Tonkawa your committee considers
part of the Mexican Nation and are not to be considered a different people from that nation. They occupy the western part of Texas.”  In 1837 “west Texas”
extended from the Colorado River to the Rio Grande. It is interesting to note the dominant Coahuiltecan Culture was not mentioned in the historic Resolution.  

         As a consequence of the Resolution, the Native American cultures between the Colorado River and Rio Grande were socially designated “Mexicans”. This
social (not citizenship) designation distinguished the Native Americans from the Spanish Colonial creole and mestizo Tejano population. Thereafter, whether a
mission or non-mission Indian, or descendant thereof, the Native Americans would be called Mexican by non-Spanish speakers while they themselves would and still
identify themselves as mejicano (as cultural not citizenship identity).

         It is this Native-born Mejicano or Native American Tejano who appears in early mid to late nineteenth century photographs and postcards of “the Mexican of
Texas”.  It must be noted that migration from Mexico into Texas did not begin until the outbreak of the Mexican Revolution in 1910. Only a small number of farm and
ranch working individuals and families from Coahuila and Tamaulipas entered Texas after the U. S. Civil War. They moved to the farms and ranches within the first
50 miles of the Rio Grande. Unfortunately, U. S. Census records from 1860 to 1900 (besides misspelling first and last names) cite all Spanish speakers as “Mexican”
or “born in Mexico”. Understandably, the Native Americans of the South Texas segment of the Camino Real de los Tejas were further denied their identity and as a
consequence thereof, most today do not know they are true natives of South Texas! Today, they identify themselves as U. S. citizens of Tejano or mejicano (not
Mexican) cultural ancestry. Above all, they are U.S. citizen descendants of families that predate both the United States and Mexico.

         At the end of our delightful luncheon meeting, Mr. Halfmoon informed me he plans to invite me to attend and speak at the planned national conference of the
Indian Nations of Texas. The National Park Service will be hosting the meeting in Oklahoma. So pending approval by the National Park Service, I replied it would be
an honor to speak for the silent Texas Coahuiltecans. The conference is months away so we shall see what comes of this planned important convocation of the
earliest residents of Texas.



End …………………….. end …………………. End ……………… end



Zavala County Sentinel – 23 – 24 April 2008